V4RB: 2008r2 to 2009r4

[Steve Albin]

On 11/19/09 at 3:38 PM, thohage at genericobjects.de (Thorsten 
Hohage) wrote:

>On 2009-11-19, at 21:09, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
>
>>On 11/19/09 8:55 PM, "Claudius Sailer" <Claudius at sailer-online.de> wrote:
>>> Or do I need Valentina 4.X
>>
>>I am not sure actually.
>>
>>So far it complains on your code as far as I see.
>
>AFAIR it is necessary to switch to V4 to use the "new" style 
>RB. The changes was made during the beta (AFAIR V11)  and 
>AFAIR(2) there was more changes necessary to successfully use 
>Valentina with RB2009Vx "x" something greater then 1.

I'm not sure this is true.  If "new" style RB refers to using 
the generic name Constructor for class constructor names instead 
of the class name, you do not need to upgrade Valentina for 
that.  I used V4RB 3.5 while RB had this restriction in place - 
I forget which version it was.  The only problem was that every 
time I opened my project in RB, I got the dialog box asking me 
if I should let RB handle the converting of the constructor 
names internally.  I would allow this and  everything was fine.

Steve

-- 
Steve Albin - Montclair, NJ
http://www.jazzdiscography.com/
http://www.steve-albin.com/