4,294,967,296 tuples problem

[william humphrey]

Meanwhile I want to just go ahead and make things work. I could even change
it to a text field if need be. I've noticed that RunRev isn't nearly, by
many factors, as responsive as Valentina.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Sims, John (CDC/CCHP/NCBDDD) (CTR) <
ayu8 at cdc.gov> wrote:

> Hi Ruslan and William,
>
>
> >Ruslan Zasukhin said:
> >
> >You mean value of probably, ULLONG field?
> >
> >I think problem is that REV plugin cannot work with int64
>
> For information purposes as you try to determine how you want to handle
> the data, it appears that Rev's largest numerical range is
> 9007199254740992 to -9007199254740992 (+/- 2^53).
>
> William, it might be a good feature request to submit to RunRev to
> support Int64.  It seems that Paradigma and RunRev have a very good
> relationship so maybe Lynn or Ruslan could contact Kevin directly and
> suggest it???  (Or, at least find out what the difficutly would be in
> RunRev supporting it and add a "best practices" way of dealing with
> large numerical values between Val and Rev to the wiki)
>
> John Sims
> CDC/NCBDDD/DBDDD
> Emergint (Northrop Grumman CITS contract)
> 404-498-3938
> ayu8 at cdc.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>



-- 
http://www.bluewatermaritime.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macserve.net/pipermail/valentina/attachments/20091217/e5085312/attachment.html