3 questions
Joseph Morgan
joseph at checkos.com
Fri Oct 19 17:32:09 CDT 2007
On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
>> Are there are some specific speed advantages by going the
>> valentina way?
>
> A lots.
>
> For example
>
> 1) Vlong.value as Ulong
> Vfield.value as Variant
>
> RBDB have only Variant way.
> But when you know EAXCT type of value this speed up things in
> times.
> and problem here in fact that RB's type() function of VARIANT
> is about 100 times slower then it must be.
> I have report them this 2-3 years ago but not fix still.
This hasn't been an issue for me in the past since I rarely use VARIANT.
I was told it was really slow so I always made sure to almost always
know what type I am dealing with.
In fact the only time I am using VARIANT, is when I am inserting only
one
record at a time or reading in only one record at a time. And since only
one at a time is very quick, it seems VARIANT speed differences would
not
make a difference.
> 2) or ability in SqlSelect() specify array of binds.
> this can speed up thins up to 20 times
I am not sure what a bind is, maybe I should look into this?
Is this similar to binary link?
More information about the Valentina
mailing list