Universal C SDK

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 8/25/06 1:23 AM, "Rosyna" <rosyna at unsanity.com> wrote:

>>>> Is there a universal version of the Valentina C SDK? Either the 1.x
>>>>  version (preferred) or the 2.x versions. Specifically I am looking
>>>>  for a universal version of libVCSDK_Macho.dylib.
>>> 
>>>  C SDK is not ported yet to 2.x product line.
>> 
>> It is more easy port C SDK 1.x to universal I think.
> 
> If that is possible... The code that uses it is all C. It was written
> to use both Valentina 1.x C SDK and SQLite to test the speed of each.
> Of course, Valentina was 10-30x faster for what I was using it for.

But not in urgent way. May be 2-4 weeks.
And this will go for you as 1.12 paid upgrade then.


>>>>  What are the OS X requirements to run the universal versions of the
>>>>  Valentina SDK?
>>> 
>>>  We have C++ SDK 1.x compiled as Universal.
>>> 
>>>      10.3 for PPC
>>>     10.4 for Intel
> 
> 10.3.x or 10.3.9? As in, is it compiled with GCC 3 on the PPC side or
> GCC 4? 

We link with 10.3.9 SDK, not sure if this really limit to 10.3.9 only.
It seems somebody have use even on 10.2..but may be I am wrong

Project settings are for PPC = GCC 3.3

> Although the C SDK is most important. Right now the application daemon is just
> running under Rosetta and the speed seems ok.

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]