Universal C SDK

[Rosyna]

Ack, at 8/25/06, Ruslan Zasukhin said:

>  >> Is there a universal version of the Valentina C SDK? Either the 1.x
>>>  version (preferred) or the 2.x versions. Specifically I am looking
>>>  for a universal version of libVCSDK_Macho.dylib.
>>
>>  C SDK is not ported yet to 2.x product line.
>
>It is more easy port C SDK 1.x to universal I think.

If that is possible... The code that uses it is all C. It was written 
to use both Valentina 1.x C SDK and SQLite to test the speed of each. 
Of course, Valentina was 10-30x faster for what I was using it for.

>
>>>  What are the OS X requirements to run the universal versions of the
>>>  Valentina SDK?
>>
>>  We have C++ SDK 1.x compiled as Universal.
>>
>>      10.3 for PPC
>  >     10.4 for Intel

10.3.x or 10.3.9? As in, is it compiled with GCC 3 on the PPC side or 
GCC 4? Although the C SDK is most important. Right now the 
application daemon is just running under Rosetta and the speed seems 
ok.
-- 


Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Holy Knight/Always needs a hug

Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People

It's either this, or imagining Phil Schiller in a thong.