Valentina 2.0. -- What is your 3 DREAM features? // Encryption

Ruslan Zasukhin sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sat Jan 31 20:51:42 CST 2004


on 1/31/04 7:39 PM, Robert Brenstein at rjb at rz.uni-potsdam.de wrote:

>>> -- simplify opening/creating encrypted database: New +
>>>  Set(Structure)Encryption + Open --> CreateEncrypted and
>>>  Set(Structure)Encryption + Open --> OpenEncrypted with Open returning
>>>  an error dbEncrypted when trying to open an encrypted db. Also
>>>  IsStructureEncrypted(fpath), IsDatabaseEncrypted(fpath) to check what
>>>  kind of db we have (this was discussed on the list last year)
>> 
>> Let's discuss this in separate thread.
>> And I did agree in the past with changes?
>> Just not sure it is possible simplify something.
> 
> Search list archive for past discussions. No, you did not actually
> agree to do this. But yes, I still find these steps non-intuitive and
> more complicated than needed, particularly for programs that allow
> our users to have either encrypted or unencrypted databases. Now it
> is an opportunity to clean this up.
> 
> Your current approach may be logical in VSDK but not in higher
> languages. I don't care what you do internally -- you can just call
> the current functions as they are.
    
Okay, 

We have not yet work on encryption in 2.0

When we will start, let's think again on this

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Valentina mailing list