UpdateAllRecords Not Working Properly?

[Ken Ray]

> > I thought that when you get a cursor against multiple records in a 
> > table and then iterate through them changing field values 
> and then use 
> > Cursor_UpdateAllRecords, that every single record in the 
> cursor would 
> > get updated...
> 
> UpdateAll, as Ruslan said, will update all the records in the 
> cursor to what you have changed that last record to.

So all I need to do is change 1 record and then hit "updateallrecords" and
they'll all get the change? For example, if I get a cursor against 10
records and then set one field of the first record to a value, can I then
say "updateallrecords" and the other 9 will get the change?

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/