UpdateAllRecords Not Working Properly?

[Robert Brenstein]

>  > > I thought that when you get a cursor against multiple records in a
>>  > table and then iterate through them changing field values
>>  and then use
>>  > Cursor_UpdateAllRecords, that every single record in the
>>  cursor would
>>  > get updated...
>>
>>  UpdateAll, as Ruslan said, will update all the records in the
>>  cursor to what you have changed that last record to.
>
>So all I need to do is change 1 record and then hit "updateallrecords" and
>they'll all get the change? For example, if I get a cursor against 10
>records and then set one field of the first record to a value, can I then
>say "updateallrecords" and the other 9 will get the change?
>
>Ken Ray
>Sons of Thunder Software
>Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
>Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/

yes. the change will be applied to all records in the cursor.

Robert