[V4RB] design of future pluign

[Charles Yeomans]

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 03:48 PM, Keith DeLong wrote:

> Ruslan,
> I'm trying hard to understand you...
>
>> Having this, I think I will be able
>> 1) have the same set of classes as now
>> 2) work as embedded engine or client
>> 3) catch errors in case e.g. Client is absent but you ask create 
>> client
>> database.
>> 4) work in combination with 2 DLLs.
>>
>> Are you ready pay for such feature having additional DLLs for your 
>> app also?
>
> How are these dlls integrated into the app? Are they distributed as 
> separate
> dll files with the application binary (like a Windows app?).
>
> This would be okay with me as long as the dlls were stored at the root 
> level
> of the application (or in a bundle). I would NOT like any dlls to live 
> at
> the system level as so often happens with windows .... The next app 
> that
> uses vserver client updates the dlls and causes my app to start 
> behaving
> erratically.  It's a support nightmare.
>


Presumably, the libraries could be included as resources in classic 
builds, and buried somewhere in the bundle for carbon builds.

Charles Yeomans