[V4RB] design of future pluign

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 5/21/03 10:48 PM, Keith DeLong at delong at redcort.com wrote:

> Ruslan,
> I'm trying hard to understand you...
> 
>> Having this, I think I will be able
>> 1) have the same set of classes as now
>> 2) work as embedded engine or client
>> 3) catch errors in case e.g. Client is absent but you ask create client
>> database.
>> 4) work in combination with 2 DLLs.
>> 
>> Are you ready pay for such feature having additional DLLs for your app also?
> 
> How are these dlls integrated into the app? Are they distributed as separate
> dll files with the application binary (like a Windows app?).

YES
 
> This would be okay with me as long as the dlls were stored at the root level
> of the application (or in a bundle).

YES! you will keep them in folder of YOUR app.

>  I would NOT like any dlls to live at
> the system level as so often happens with windows ....

No, we do not need move this to system level

> The next app that uses vserver client updates the dlls and causes my app to
> start behaving erratically.  It's a support nightmare.

Correct. 

When we have DLLs in folder of our app, we have no problems with upgrades.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------