[V4RB] design of future pluign

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 5/21/03 7:09 PM, john roberts at jarobe01 at athena.louisville.edu wrote:

> 
>> I think that we can do it better by not using DLLs.  What I want is the
>> ability to use both local and remote databases in the same application.
>> Otherwise I don't see an easy way to write applications that have
>> intermittent database connections.
> 
> I too want the ability to work with local and remote databases. Not being
> able to access both from within the same program would be a major "loss of
> power". Case in point: I want to download a major chunk of the remote
> database, massage the data in some fashion and return it to the owning
> database.
> 
> It seems to me (in my ignorance) that (1) making the connections will differ
> between remote and local but (2) once the connections are made,
> communication within the program should be the same. Is this a technical
> problem or a security issue ?

This is technical question. We need find nice way to resolve it.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------