[V4RB] design of future pluign

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 5/21/03 6:24 PM, Charles Yeomans at yeomans at desuetude.com wrote:

>> Today I have wake up, and get one more idea.
>> May be we ca solve this, but payment -- V4RB will be not single plugin
>> as
>> know, but set
>> 
>>         V4RB + VEngine.dll + Vclient.dll
>> 
>> Having this, I think I will be able
>> 1) have the same set of classes as now
>> 2) work as embedded engine or client
>> 3) catch errors in case e.g. Client is absent but you ask create client
>> database.
>> 4) work in combination with 2 DLLs.
>> 
>> Are you ready pay for such feature having additional DLLs for your app
>> also?
> 
> Perhaps, depending on the price.

:-) Charles, I did mean not money!

I mean fact, that we will have now DLLs ?
So your app will looks as

        app + Engine.dll
        app + Engine.dll + Client.dll
    
 
>> I know that PrimeBase do this. Although they do it as ONLY ONE of them.
>> Primebase plugin for REALbasic, allow you COMPILE one EXE file of your app,
>> And on the fly you or your customer, can put any of this DLLs and fix some
>> ini file to choose if this app should work as standalone or remote client.
>> 
>> We can do this even better I think.
> 
> I think that we can do it better by not using DLLs.  What I want is the
> ability to use both local and remote databases in the same application.
> Otherwise I don't see an easy way to write applications that have
> intermittent database connections.

Charles, but I do not see other good way

If you see it tell me.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------