Valentina and .Net

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 10/9/13 8:17 AM, "Lynn Fredricks" <lfredricks at proactive-intl.com> wrote:

Hi Harris,

>> I am seriously thinking about moving to Valentina. It seems
>> to be a very good option from the testing that I've done. I'm
>> going to do some more testing but I am pretty sure I will be
>> moving to it in the near future. The VDN is something I am
>> very interested in.
> 
> Its often overlooked as a feature, but since we support so many technologies
> including both Xojo and .net, its one less thing to worry about should at
> some time in the future you need to work with another tool. It's the same
> thing over on the Mac as well. We get developers who work with a tool like
> LiveCode or Xojo or even Director on the Mac, then later they want to move
> over to using xCode / Objective-C.

Lynn was faster of me on this point :-)

Another point of view on this is:

* you can be able easier get solution, when few different languages are
used.

Even working with LOCAL db, you still can use Stored SQL Procedures,
to put some logic right into .vdb file.

Then you will have less to code in Xojo and .NET parts.

With client/server solution, usage of SPs can be even more welcome.


-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]