REALBasic changed .rb to .rbp ?

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 8/18/09 12:41 PM, "Ernesto Giannotta" <ernestogiannotta at tiscalinet.it>
wrote:

Hi Erne,

>> This is first time I hear about such issue.
>> Anybody have comments on this?
>> 
> 
> well, .rb files are seen as Ruby ones so .rbp is indeed the right
> extension for RB projects right now.
> 
>> I assume this developer uses latest RB release or may be even beta...
>> 
>> Strange about Old Style Constructors. This was fixed far ago ...
>> 
> 
> I checked some examples, and all of them seem to have the correct new
> Constructors style...
> 
> maybe the user refers to the new Deprecated Super Control warnings
> suggesting to migrate from old EditField to new TextArea and TextField
> controls...

Thank you a lots, Erne.

Then question is, if we will change to .rbp,
how old RB version will recognize this?
    RB 2007?
    RB 2008?



-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]