[DISCUSSION] Object Relational Mapping (ORM) - faulting/collections

[Bart Pietercil]

On 14-okt-07, at 16:59, Philip Mötteli wrote:

> Am 14.10.2007 um 16:46 schrieb Ruslan Zasukhin:
>
>> On 14/10/07 3:07 PM, "Philip Mötteli"  
>> <philip.moetteli at econophone.ch> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wait.
>>
>> You have TWO tables TA and TB.
>>
>> BinaryLink WITH ORDER stored poairs of RecIDs of these 2 tables.
>>     nothing more.
>>
>> It not stores OID...
>>
>> It seems you ask me if its psosibe to have such BinaryLink based  
>> on OIDs.
>> Technically yes. But if it have sense? I have not think about this  
>> way yet.
>
> I don't know for your internal design. But for me this is the only  
> thing that makes sense.
> I can put into a collection whatever object I want. Not only  
> objects of one type.


Would this setup not mean that one only needs one (1) BINARY link for  
all his needs( within that db)

Since you can link with an OID pair anything to anything you don't  
need to define more than one binary link for a given database


Bart