[DISCUSSION] Object Relational Mapping (ORM) - faulting
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Thu Oct 11 01:26:06 CDT 2007
On 11/10/07 1:55 AM, "Thorsten Hohage" <thohage at objectmanufactur.com> wrote:
>> Or this is only description of LINK ?
>
> No, it's not the description of a LINK, it's the "definition". Based
> on this definition the framework recognized that when a Value like
> "objectValues.MyValue" is requested, the "objectValues" adresses a
> linked table.
>
> Now, with the given parameter and a lot of logic the framework loads
> the data or in most cases creates a fault, can add it on object level
> to the parent, ... and many more things. In some cases the parent
> object knows about the childs he needs to load immedeately and create
> faults of all the linked objects.
>
> Furthermore the instantiated "Link"-object have a lot of methods,
> properties, ...
Btw, Faulting is one of the things I hate in OR Frameworks.
I was told on Cocoa list, that its true that if table T5 has million
records, then system prepare million small RAM objects for future faulting.
IMO this is huge overhead.
IMO this is limited way by hardware.
So is this true that all million objects are prepared?
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list