[DISCUSS] Missing basic features ? ROADMAP
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Wed Mar 21 08:51:06 CDT 2007
On 21/3/07 3:33 PM, "Thorsten Hohage" <thohage at objectmanufactur.com> wrote:
>> * for say 3.1
>> we will add support of LOG file, which can monitor all changes
>> and be applied to latest BACUKP.
>
> Wish No. 3 - it can life make so easy regarding creation of patch
> files for different versions of deployed databases, when development
> goes on.
>
>
>> * and then all efforts will be directed to implementation of
>> transactions,
>> commit, rollback, auto-recover. Special timestamps fields,..
>> ALL this should go into Valentina 4.0
>
> Wish No. n+1, n+2, ...
>
>
>> * parallel we can and should improve such things as
>
>> - table inheritance
>
> YES - please - great Wish No. 4
Also we dream about such VSERVER related features as:
* UDP instead of sockets, they say this will improve speed
about 2 times if Vclient and Vserver are on the same computer.
* Client-side cache.
OO DBMS claims that RDBMS cannot have it.
We do not see technical problems to implement it for VServer
* Better User/Group control and permissions control.
* Asynchronous connections between Vclient and Vserver
like have Postgre. So Vserver can send events to Vclient.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list