Performance Val 3.1
Charles Yeomans
charles at declareSub.com
Mon Jul 16 09:42:06 CDT 2007
On Jul 16, 2007, at 4:54 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
> On 16/7/07 11:05 AM, "Leo Van den Brande"
> <leo_van_den_brande at wxs.nl> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Aha !!!!!
>>>
>>> Please check if your DEBUG APP build produce V4RB_xxxxx.log ?
>>>
>>> If yes then THIS IS why.
>>> You can disable it. Check docs about Valentina.DebugLevel
>>>
>>
>> Genial!
>>
>> The results are:
>>
>> Table "TBFdata"(11192 records, 3 of 34 fields queried).
>> Log on: v3.1: 24.2 sec. v1.1: 2.98 sec.
>> Log off: v3.1: 2.4 sec. v1.1: 0.58 sec.
>>
>> A great improvement.
>>
>> Could the remaining difference netween 3.1 and 1.1 have to do with
>> better
>> performance of RB 5.5, used with Val 1.1 and RB 2007 3, used with
>> Val 3.1?
>
> A lots of INSERTS ?
>
> I have not hear that RB 2007 is a lots slower of older RB.
> This is true ?
No. Although of course you must ask "slower at what?". My sorting
code is no slower in Rb 2007 than in earlier versions.
Charles Yeomans
More information about the Valentina
mailing list