3.0->3.1

[Bart Pietercil]

  I think the change was necessary due to the "upgrade" of binary links.
If I recall correctly the status of binary links is changed from nice  
to have when substituting simple m-to-m tables to recommended for all  
kinds of pointers (even overtaken objectpointers).

This upgrade brought along file format changes


hth

Bart Pietercil

On 2-jul-07, at 06:23, Kim Kohen wrote:

> folks,
>
> Can someone please let me know what's necessary to change a db from  
> 3.0 to 3.1? The release notes on the paradigma site still refer to  
> 3.0.2;  in fact I couldn't find any reference to 3.1 on the web  
> site apart from the downloads:)
>
> Given that it requires a change in db structure, I think some sort  
> of docs would be appropriate.
>
> cheers and thanks
>
> kim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina