Killing the Cursor that Wouldn't Die
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sun Jan 7 03:35:30 CST 2007
On 6/1/07 5:56 PM, "Chuck Pelto" <cbpelto at pcisys.net> wrote:
Hi Chuck,
> Greetings & Happy New Year,
>
> I've got a bit of a problem.
>
> I'm getting a 'record is locked' error when I try to find records
> related to another record.
>
> System tells me the record I'm looking for is 'locked'.
>
> The record is being found with a RW SQL call.
>
> It was found earlier. So I figured I needed to do a NL SQL call on
> the same search criteria in order to unlock it before trying to find
> it again. [Note: This has to do with changing views in RB, going from
> FORM view to a LIST view and then back to a FORM view of the record I
> was looking at before going to the LIST view of all records in the
> found set.]
>
> So I do the NL SQL. And I do another RW SQL on the same search string/
> criteria. Then I get the 'record is locked' error.
>
> Reading in the archives, I see where it is written that the cursor
> will go away, and I presume the lock on the records as well, when the
> cursor dies. What is the call?
1)
cursor = nil
really must kill it, if you do not have other references to this cursor.
2) another solution of your problem can be using kNoLocks when you do
SqlSelect().
> I've tried theCursor = nil.
Right, this kill cursor and remove locks.
> I've tried thisCursor = App.tDatabase.SQLSelect(sqlString,
> EVCursorLocation.kServerSide, EVLockType.kNoLocks,
> EVCursorDirection.kRandom).
>
> Neither will release the previously found set of records.
This do not release first set of records, it just should ignore existed
locks.
> How do you 'kill' the cursor so it 'dies'? I'm loath to use the .45
> cal ACP on the computer....
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list