SQL Question
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Mon Jul 24 02:09:15 CDT 2006
On 7/24/06 2:03 AM, "Chuck Pelto" <cbpelto at pcisys.net> wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
>
>> No.
>>
>> Because different kinds of queries return different kinds of cursors
>> "internally".
>
> So, when they invented SQL they forgot how to simplify things and
> therefore, we have to deal with an additional layer of complexity
> when doing sorts of data by having to do another SQL SELECT
> call.....that's niiiiiice. [Note: If you're familiar with the old
> joke about the class reunion of the two southern belles, forgive my
> foul language.]
>
> Okay. Next time you get a chance to talk to the people working on the
> next revision of SQL, I recommend you ask them to streamline the
> language by allowing for re-ordering of records in a cursor WITHOUT
> having to do a SELECT call again.
And this is why Valentina have not only SQL. :-)
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list