[ATTN!] Inform us about your show-stoppers bugs in 2.4 betas if any!

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 7/8/06 11:33 AM, "Dave Addey" <listmail1 at dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

Hi Dave,

> I understand now - thanks!  I changed my test project to use API-way, and
> everything works fine.
> 
> I had been looking for an article like that one - it makes everything much
> clearer.  It would be useful if you could add in some advantages and
> disadvantages for the Class-way, to make it very very clear that the
> structure is "fixed" when you use the class-way.
> 
> I shall change my code to use the API-way!

In fact you may be not need do this.

I have point that you can have N fixed tables, and few dynamic.
Or all your tables are dynamic ?

Note also that in v2 exists ability create TMP table.
This table will be stored not in .dat file but in hidden tmp volume.
So after even crash of system your main .dat file is not affected.


I think that 80% of RB developers use Class way.
It is comfortable for app developers.
And it produce even *little* faster code because you use direct pointers
instead ask each time db.Table(Name)  and table.Field("name")


-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]