SQL problem

[Charles Yeomans]

On Dec 20, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:

> On 12/06/19 11:09 PM, "Charles Yeomans" <charles at declareSub.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>>> Maybe -- it seems like SQL standard date format should also be
>>>> supported.
>>>
>>> You mean    'YYYY-MM-DD' ?
>>>
>>> As I remember choice was or support this or support dependency on
>>> db.DateTimeFormat.
>>
>> Why was this a choice?
>
> How you see else?
>
> In SQL92 standard it is strictly 'YYYY-MM-DD'
> Right.
>
> So if we do this strictly this format, then we start ignore our own
> db.DateTimeFormat settings (which often mirror SYSTEM settings).

It seems possible to me to handle either format in SQL statements.

Charles Yeomans