SQL problem

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 12/06/19 11:09 PM, "Charles Yeomans" <charles at declareSub.com> wrote:

>>> Maybe -- it seems like SQL standard date format should also be
>>> supported.
>> 
>> You mean    'YYYY-MM-DD' ?
>> 
>> As I remember choice was or support this or support dependency on
>> db.DateTimeFormat.
> 
> Why was this a choice?

How you see else?

In SQL92 standard it is strictly 'YYYY-MM-DD'
Right.

So if we do this strictly this format, then we start ignore our own
db.DateTimeFormat settings (which often mirror SYSTEM settings).


-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]