Vcomponents in Mach-O Package
Dave Addey
listmail1 at dsl.pipex.com
Wed Dec 21 15:56:13 CST 2005
Hi Ruslan,
>> It would be very nice if the MACHO version of the components could be a true
>> Framework. This seems to be the recommended way to bundle together all of
>> the elements of something like VComponents. The VComponents.framework could
>> then live in the application bundle, for example:
>>
>> /Contents/Frameworks/VComponents.framework
>
> No it is as:
>
> /Contents/VComponents
To be honest, as long as it works, I'm happy. Although Apple say:
"While executable and resource files are standard in most bundles, there are
several other special directories that are not needed by most bundles. These
directories include the following:
"A Frameworks directory contains any private libraries and frameworks used
by the executable"
(http://developer.apple.com/documentation/CoreFoundation/Conceptual/CFBundle
s/Concepts/BundleAnatomy.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001119-110730-TPXREF5)
So even if it's just a folder of Vcomponents, and not a "Framework" in the
literal Apple sense, it should really go in
/Contents/Frameworks/Vcomponents. But as I say, if it works, I'm happy :-)
>> A development computer could also have the framework installed in
>> /Library/Frameworks/ to make it available to all applications.
>
> Instead we go into /usr/local/lib
Fine by me!
Dave.
More information about the Valentina
mailing list