Death to recursion! Re: Child vs parent records
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sun Dec 11 17:45:31 CST 2005
On 12/11/05 5:32 PM, "Ed Kleban" <Ed at Kleban.com> wrote:
> And providing a powerful, generalized BinaryLink mechanism that can be used
> to define 1:M, M:M, M:1, and 1:1 links... but then telling the user
>
> "Oh but if you have M:1 in your mind change it to 1:M in the call to
> CreateBinaryLink or else the EVRecursionDirection parameters will work
> wrong when you call FindLinked."
>
> is limiting, unnecessary, and offers the potential for confusion and error.
Okay I agree
> My subject should not have been "Death to Recursion!" it should have been
> "Death to Inconsistent nomenclature in functions that define a link from
> from functions which use a link".
> But "Death to Recursion!" is shorter and has a nice ring to it. It got
> your attention, didn't it ?
Hard to say
I read all your letters very carefully :-)
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list