Efficient use of text-containing field
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Tue Dec 6 18:17:02 CST 2005
On 12/6/05 5:02 PM, "jda" <jda at his.com> wrote:
>>> As for the sortmethod, this is unavoidable in Valentina if I need to
>>> sort by this field. I have suggested in the past that Valentina
>>> default to sort by entire field if the field is indexedbywords. That
>>> would mean I could get rid of about 30 sort methods!
>>
>> There is no way to sort BY INDEX which is by words.
>>
>> So choices will be
>>
>> A) do not indexed sorting. slowest
>> can be acceptable only if you have small selection of records.
>> and more overhead here
>>
>> B) ... Still have some index ...
>>
>
> I'm sorry, but I want to make sure I understand.
>
> Can I do a non-method sort on fields that are indexedByWords?
NO.
> My understanding is that this is not possible (at ANY speed).
right
> That is why I use a sort method.
right
> If it *is* possible to sort an indexedByWords field (again, speed is not an
> issue for me), please tell me how.
No way currently.
I have talk about future feature
You sure you will not complain later? :-)
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list