[V4RB] ReadOnly Cursor doesn't need to lock records, does it?

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 1/24/04 10:12 PM, Richard Altenburg at valentina at brainchild.nl wrote:

>> IF you VERY need the first cursor to show ALL records,
>> You can use for it NoLocks
> 
> So does ReadOnly on a Cursor mean that all records in it are ReadOnly for
> others? I thought it would be ReadOnly for my process that created the
> Cursor.

No, if one set READ lock, then nobody cannot set WRITE lock on that record.

> So I will try NoLocks, because I do need a Cursor that has all records in
> it, and several other cursors that handle other tasks.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------