[V4RB] ReadOnly Cursor doesn't need to lock records, does it?

[Richard Altenburg]

On 24-01-2004 18:18, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public.kherson.ua> wrote:

> IF you VERY need the first cursor to show ALL records,
> You can use for it NoLocks

So does ReadOnly on a Cursor mean that all records in it are ReadOnly for
others? I thought it would be ReadOnly for my process that created the
Cursor.

So I will try NoLocks, because I do need a Cursor that has all records in
it, and several other cursors that handle other tasks.

-- 

Richard Altenburg
Brainchild        <http://www.brainchild.nl/>
Picture Patrol    <http://www.picturepatrol.com/>