V4RB Performance on Windows

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 3/10/03 10:34 AM, Peter De Berdt at peter.de.berdt at pandora.be wrote:

>>>> Performance on Windows V4RB seems to be significantly slower than on
>>>>  the Mac.
>>>> 
>>>>  Example
>>>>  Creating database with 3 tables, with a total of 15 fields, varchar,
>>>>  double, long, no BLOBs.
>>>>  populating with 2-10 records each.
>>>>  6MB Cache
>>>> 
>>>>  On Mac G3 700Mhz iBook OS X 10.2.4 - instantaneous.
>>>> 
>>>>  On Windows 1Ghz Athlon with 512MB Ram, takes 20 seconds to  create and
>>>>  open.
>>>>  Has a lot of disk activity during this time.
>>>>  Just opening the DB is closer to Mac performance.
>>>>  File size after creating is around 150K.
>>>> 
>>>>  Built with RB 4.5.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.4
>>>> 
>>>>  Is this normal?
>>>>  Is this a function of RB?
>> 
>> May be slow HDD in that PC ?
> 
> Nope, have the same problem with a fairly large project of mine: 8
> tables, total of 80 fiels, strings, doubles, ushorts, ulongs, no
> blobs. Takes forever on a brand new Dell PC... Record loading is also
> slower (and no, it's not RB related, because I only read the records
> needed to populate the visible part of the listbox, the others are
> fetched when the user scrolls using the scrollbar).

Nit sure if this is RB or not affected.

Because as Guan have show, Valentina for Director for windows works fast.

Difference between V4RB and V4MD is also that
    V4RB is compiled by CodeWarrior
    V4MD by Visual C++.

Okay, let's keep eye on this issue.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://listserv.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------