V4RB Performance on Windows
Peter De Berdt
peter.de.berdt at pandora.be
Mon Mar 10 09:34:01 CST 2003
> >> Performance on Windows V4RB seems to be significantly slower than on
>>> the Mac.
>>>
>>> Example
>>> Creating database with 3 tables, with a total of 15 fields, varchar,
>>> double, long, no BLOBs.
>>> populating with 2-10 records each.
>>> 6MB Cache
>>>
>>> On Mac G3 700Mhz iBook OS X 10.2.4 - instantaneous.
>>>
>>> On Windows 1Ghz Athlon with 512MB Ram, takes 20 seconds to create and
>>> open.
>>> Has a lot of disk activity during this time.
>>> Just opening the DB is closer to Mac performance.
>>> File size after creating is around 150K.
>>>
>>> Built with RB 4.5.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.4
>>>
>>> Is this normal?
>>> Is this a function of RB?
>
>May be slow HDD in that PC ?
Nope, have the same problem with a fairly large project of mine: 8
tables, total of 80 fiels, strings, doubles, ushorts, ulongs, no
blobs. Takes forever on a brand new Dell PC... Record loading is also
slower (and no, it's not RB related, because I only read the records
needed to populate the visible part of the listbox, the others are
fetched when the user scrolls using the scrollbar).
--
Best regards,
Peter De Berdt
--------------
My software never has bugs, it just generates random features...
More information about the Valentina
mailing list