Help - "filter on/include-omit function"

Ruslan Zasukhin sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Fri Mar 7 17:28:52 CST 2003


on 3/7/03 5:00 PM, Tonio Virgilio LEVRA at levra at yahoo.com wrote:

Hi Tonio,

I am not sure I am ready solve such complex tasks now :-)
So I have CC this to list.

> I've a big problem that I've no idea on how to solve
> it.
> Please give me some hints.
> 
> This is the scenario:
> 
> Imagine a db of 65.000 record (all the articles of a
> news paper for 1 year)
> Imagine that every record has five "index_description"
> field in which there are 1 o more, word keys
> (example of one of this filed:
> rec1: |...|...|TELEVISIONE, QUARTIERE|...|...|...|
> rec2: |...|...|DENUNCIA, ATTI OSCENI, STRANIERI, SCI,
> TURISMO|...|...|...|
> rec3: |...|...|MANIFESTAZIONI,STRANIERI|...|...|...|
> rec4: |...|...|STRANIERI|...|...|...|
> ...).
> Imagine that all the word keys present in this five
> "index_description" field are also organized in a
> separate tree structure (example:
> -ambiente    
> acqua
> atmosfera
> boschi
> discariche
> inquinamento
> mare
> montagna
> rifiuti
> caccia
> -armi    
> esplosivi
> -attentato    
> -carburanti    
> benzina
> petrolio
> ...).
> 
> This is the need:
> 
> At every query I need to fill the tree-structure with
> the number of record found for every item of the same
> tree structure, 
> considering that a sigle record could have more than
> one word key, the same record could be counted in more
> than one item
> 
> This is the problem:
> 
> How can I do that?
> a. Do multiple query... (I have more than 1000 item
> for the five tre structure)

May be

> b. Use multiple group by/count for the same query...
> (it is possible? anyway I need to do more than
> 1000...)

no

> c. Are there other solutions like filter_on or
> include/omit functions ?

no

> d. Are there other solutions like to map some record
> count on some selected group of field
> e. Something else you can know?

In fact I have not understand how RESULT must looks.

> Note: A previous version of this program was already
> made in DOS/Win 3.1 and of course now on win xp it
> looks amazingly fast.

So how it was made ???

With SQL ?
With filtering in FoxPro
With help of navigational db like dbVsita ?


-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://listserv.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Valentina mailing list