[For None] Valentina Server (you really don't want to read this)

[Fred.Stephenson]

<groan.>
Ah well I suppose I knew it was too good to be true. After reading my 
mails last night I went to bed with dreams and actually slept through 
for 5 whole hours.
Back to reality Freddy my boy -- "commercial perspectives" burst the 
bubble and one asks oneself ............... Oh forget it !!
</groan>

Go back to  trying to figure out
- why XP keeps quitting the server application every time I close a socket.
- why some "0"s on a mac are "1"s on a pc.
- why
- why
- why
- why did I get up today ;?)



why am I writing this -- Cos' it makes me feel better. Sorry but the 
subject did warn you ;?).

all the best

Fred




>  > In a way you're right-- all this new technology requires more
>>  than 4.5 months time. I'd bet it won't all be ready for prime
>>  time commercial deployment before fall.
>>
>>  On the other hand, this is an asinine position for you to
>>  take after I've made it clear that as a Valentina developer,
>>  I've been patient for years and I am hurting with an existing
>>  user base of nearly a thousand of users. It's a very long
>>  time in my situation Lynn. It's unfortunate you care so
>>  little about the vital needs of this Valentina developer when
>>  Ruslan has a nearly complete intermediate solution.
>
>I can appreciate that its been a long time coming. Based on the many new
>releases and subsequent infinite stream of beta releases of those many
>new Valentina 1.x products, this baby needs to be brought to term
>without any more distraction.Its clear that adding and supporting new
>derivative products of Valentina 1.x has significantly delayed work on
>Valentina 2. This would be another one.
>
>Many here have had the experience where a bug is tripping them up, and
>Ruslan spends a day or so (or weekend, or evening sleep or whatever) to
>fix it so that they can deliver a product on schedule. Ruslan is a nice
>guy to do that. But that too has significantly delayed work on Valentina
>2.
>
>>From a purely *commercial* perspective, adding a Valentina 1.x server
>solution does not make sense with Valentina 2 this far along. Also, I
>don't believe it could be released and "finished" by the end of the
>month and still not continue to drain resources from Valentina 2
>development.
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>Lynn Fredricks
>President
>Proactive International, LLC
>
>http://www.proactive-intl.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Valentina mailing list
>Valentina at lists.macserve.net
>http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina


--