Stan's slow problem

Ruslan Zasukhin sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sat May 27 12:59:40 CDT 2006


On 5/27/06 12:44 PM, "Stan Busk" <maxprog at mac.com> wrote:

Hi Stan,

>> May be RAM is eaten?
>>     Try watch in Activity monitor
> 
> I can't really see that effect so far but will test.
> 
> I found out that all the slow queries have something in common, the
> use of COUNT() or SUM() like:
> 
> SELECT Count(*) FROM tblArticle WHERE
> Article_MessageID LIKE 'aReference'
> AND Article_Status NOT LIKE '%D%'
> AND Article_Status NOT LIKE '%S%'
> 
> SELECT Count(*) FROM tblArticle WHERE
> Article_References LIKE '%aReference"%'
> AND Article_MessageID NOT LIKE 'inMessageID'
> AND Article_Status NOT LIKE '%D%'
> AND Article_Status NOT LIKE '%S%'
> 
> including simple ones like:
> 
> SELECT Count(*) FROM tblArticle WHERE
> Article_Newsgroups LIKE '%inGroup%'
> 
> I personally think Valentina 2.3 has a serious speed problem with
> COUNT() and SUM() functions. As soon as you revert to Valentina v2.2,
> it works at normal speed again. So my question is, what happened
> between v2.2 and v2.3 that could affect COUNT() and SUM() ? Right now
> it is faster for me to count and sum manually with a for...next.

> I have the problem in 3 different projects with about 30 queries
> using COUNT() and SUM() functions. Could you compare v2.2 and v2.3
> speed for those functions?

You need find AT LEAST one slow query or slow case.

I want get next:

    database
    query

    Your time on this db and query using 2.2
    Your time on this db and query using 2.3

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]




More information about the Valentina-beta mailing list