valentina 2

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 1/10/05 9:19 AM, "Olivier" <vidal_olivier at yahoo.fr> wrote:

>  New tests : 
> 
> Stopwatches indicated below are valid ONLY as comparison between Valentina 1
> and 2. 
> They does not need to take them theoretically. They do not calculate the RAW
> speed of Valentina 1 or 2.
> Because there are several factors which SLOW DOWN Adds (display of a
> progressbar, several methods of processing of strings before "addrecord",
> strings got back by a listBox, etc.).
> 
> BUT they are the SAME factors for Valentina 1 and Valentina 2.
> 
> Valentina 1 cache : 20 Mo
> Valentina 2 cache : 50 Mo
> DebugLevel disabled.
> 
> 3 string fields. 1 boolean field. 2 strings are indexed. 1 string is UNIQUE.
> 
> Add x lines With cursor With API Valentina 1
> 
> 100 lines 2 s 2 s 2 s
> 600 2 2 2 
> 3000 9 8 3 
> 5000 17 16 3 
> 8000 35 34 4 
> 17000 109 6 
> 25000 180 8 
> 36000 329 322 10 
> 
> There the cursor is pratically also fast as the API.

Oliver, remind please

    first column?  Second ?  Third ?


-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------