[V4RB] Binary link error
Erik Mueller-Harder
valentina-list at vermontsoftworks.com
Wed Aug 11 16:37:15 CDT 2004
Hi, Ruslan --
On Aug 11, 2004, at 14:11, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
> Okay, I see where is problem.
>
> You try to work via Classes way, i.e. Static way.
> You create tables and link BEFORE you have do db.Create()
>
> Right now primary our tests targeted to DYNAMIC way,
> I.e. Db is opened and we tell it create/drop objects.
>
> Classes way is more hard, and not all parts work yet.
>
> So you can try to use BinaryLink without classes.
I'd like to, but I don't see yet how to get a persistent database with
your dynamic method. There are many examples of dynamically creating
and dropping tables, but I haven't been able to find any example that
shows how to open an existing database with this dynamic API.
I love the idea of dropping the objectptr fields -- and, even more, of
dropping my many-to-many link tables. My new database would have about
a dozen 1:M relations as well as another dozen or so M:M join tables,
and it would be GREAT to replace these with direct binary links at the
database level.
So will there be -- or is there now -- a way to get this persistence
via your new API? Or should I stick with the older class method? And,
if I need to stick with the class approach, will your new binary links
work with it?
Thanks for any clarification you can give!
-- Erik
More information about the Valentina-beta
mailing list