Question about search speed
jda
jda at his.com
Mon Jan 28 07:52:26 CST 2013
Good point! I didn't when I designed this search (years ago), but I do now. I'll try that.
Thanks.
Jon
P.S. FWIW, in the original search I tried using RecID instead of my own id field
SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE id > (select max(id) - 20 from mutable)
This improved the speed, but only about twofold: 20 seconds to 10 seconds. Still slow.
> Do you have a creation date time for your records ?
>
> select * from myTable order by creation_dt DESC limit 20
>
> hth
>
> Bart
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2013, at 14:33, jda <jda at his.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a built-in search that finds the last 20 records entered. Each record has a unique sequential number (1..N) in the field "id", and this is the query:
>>
>>
>> SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE id > (select max(id) - 20 from mytable)
>>
>>
>> It works, but is very slow. With a database of ~7000 records it takes ~20 seconds.
>>
>> Is there a way to optimize this (using V4.9.1, Mac OS X).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jon
>> _______________________________________________
>> Valentina mailing list
>> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
>> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
More information about the Valentina
mailing list