odd indexed string behaviour?

George Parkinson george at microtherapy.ca
Tue Aug 28 08:39:54 CDT 2012


hello bart,
thanks for the idea.
in this case, i'm not sure that will work all the time due to not being guaranteed unique.
george


________________________________
 From: Mr. Bart Pietercil <bart.pietercil at cognosis.be>
To: Valentina Developers <valentina at lists.macserve.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:20:45 AM
Subject: Re: odd indexed string behaviour?
 

Hi ,

we solved the indexing problem by MD5 the string. This effectively solved the 256 symbols problem.
Just an idea…

regards

Bart



On 28 Aug 2012, at 15:09, George Parkinson wrote:

hi ruslan,
>the problem is two-fold...storage and indexing
>
>
>1 - storage: for this project,  i ship out read-only survey results.   
>clients never start with an empty db...they consume what is shipped.
>i'm going to have major push back from clients (000's) when i replace what i ship now with something approaching twice the size.  
>
>
>2 - indexing: the first 256 symbols of each record is indeed 256 when using utf8, but becomes 128 when using utf16.
>i have a field of 188 characters (ascii 34-127) that is essentially the index...but with utf16 indexing won't work.
>
>
>splitting into two fields, with each indexed won't work because the 128 symbol limit is for the record.
>dropping the index is not an option because of the volume of data (hundreds of thousands of records a month with an average retention of 4 yrs). 
>
>
>
>this is why i'm looking for utf8 in valentina.
>
>
>
>thanks,
>george
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Ruslan Zasukhin <ruslan_zasukhin at valentina-db.com>
>To: "valentina at lists.macserve.net" <valentina at lists.macserve.net> 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:33:09 AM
>Subject: Re: odd indexed string behaviour?
> 
>On 8/28/12 4:52 AM, "George Parkinson" <george at microtherapy.ca> wrote:
>
>Hi George,
>
>> ok "utf16 for now".
>> 
>> i really want to use valentina for a major project but the lack of utf8 is a
>> roadblock. 
>
>Why? 
>
>Do you going to use TEXT Fields?
>If yes, you can use ZIP compression still having indexing.
>
>I hard see that today size of db can matter  ...
>HDDs are so cheap .
>
>
>> will it become reality?  and if so, can you estimate when?
>
>Yes why not, 
>
>When we seat and fix that utf8 related issues.
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
>
>Ruslan Zasukhin
>VP Engineering and New Technology
>Paradigma Software,
 Inc
>
>Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
>http://www.paradigmasoft.com
>
>[I feel the need: the need for speed]
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Valentina mailing list
>Valentina at lists.macserve.net
>http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Valentina mailing list
>Valentina at lists.macserve.net
>http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>

_______________________________________________
Valentina mailing list
Valentina at lists.macserve.net
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macserve.net/pipermail/valentina/attachments/20120828/1c5fb59d/attachment.html>


More information about the Valentina mailing list