Valentina Server on A NAS

[Trausti Thor Johannsson]

And usually these so called NAS boxes have a crippled Linux version, real small amount of memory and very little disk space for it self.

I would not do that.


Trausti

On Apr 6, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Robert Brenstein wrote:

> On 03.04.11 at 15:25 +0200 F. Kneubuehl apparently wrote:
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> 	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CBF213.5E044670"
>> Content-Language: de-ch
>> 
>> Hi Ruslan
>> 
>> Most NAS (Synology, BuffaloŠ) are running some implementation of LINUX. So I thought (naively) that it must be possible to run VS on a NAS. That would be a very cheap and handy DB server incl. RAID 1/5. But I have to state again: my knowledge about LINUX is ZERO!
>> 
>> Read also the followingŠ
>> 
>> http://forum.synology.com/wiki/index.php/How_does_the_Synology_Linux_implementation_work,_e.g._bootup,_device_management_etc
>> 
>> Regards
>> Fabian
>> 
>> 
> 
> NAS are running on some linux but usually provide only remote volume service. Thhat means it is possible to use them only as network-based storage normally, but not to run a server using them as a server computer. However, used computer hardware costs about the same as decent NAS.
> 
> Robert
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>