SQL tuning?
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Fri Nov 21 04:05:30 CST 2008
On 11/21/08 11:34 AM, "Tiemo Hollmann TB" <toolbook at kestner.de> wrote:
Hi Tiemo,
> beeing not a SQL expert I wonder if the performance of my plain SELECT
> statement can be designed faster.
>
> What I am doing right now (and that is already pretty good performing) is
> the following. To make my code easy to maintain I have only one single build
> of the SQL string. I have to compare 4 indexed fields in a WHERE clause.
> Each of the 4 fields can be included in the selection or not and every
> combination of the 4 fields can be selected. So what I did is:
>
> put "SELECT " & tSelect & " FROM t1" &\
>
> " WHERE t1.f1 LIKE " & s1 " \
>
> and t1.f2 LIKE " & s2 " \
>
> and t1.f3 LIKE " & s3 " \
>
> and t1.f4 LIKE " & s4 into tSQL
>
> and my search variables s1,s2,s3,s4 can contain a search value
> ("%searchstring%") or, if I want to exclude this field from the search I
> just put a "%" into that search variable.
THIS IS THE FIRST what you can optimize!
If you do not need search on field DO NOT include it into SELECT at all!
> Btw I need the comparison with
> LIKE "%searchstring%" for each field. I wanted to avoid to build 16
> different SQL stings, depending on which one of the search values has a
> content or not.
No need build 16.
You can use IF ELSE
> Is there anything what I can design better while keeping my code as simple
> and compact, as it is right now?
>
> Thanks for any coaching
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list