[V4RB] Constructor?

[billmounce at comcast.net]

Sorry to keep coming back. I will stop after this.


> > Thanks. When I started with Valentina 1 -- that was a long time ago  
> > -- we always made a constructor for the database objects. Am I right  
> > to assume that even when using classes to access Valentina (which I  
> > assume is the way we did it way back then) that having a constructor  
> > is no longer necessary?
> 
> 
> No, the question if necessary or not is still the same - IMHO in most  
> cases yes - BUT the big difference is the naming.

I do not know what IMHO is. Are you saying I leave the constructor but name it "Constructor"? I wish I could find a tutorial project that showed this in action. I wrote an address book demo and it was linked to by Valentina, but that was years ago and I can't find another one.

> You should seriously(!!!) check the RB list archives or forum, due to  
> several issues on redesigning the code to fit the new schema.

I found the archives but as I remember someone had a version of them that was searchable. Is that still active?

Thanks.

Bill