Data synchronization

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 3/9/07 11:41 AM, "Bart Pietercil" <bart.pietercil at gmail.com> wrote:

> Still though we would very much like the features talked about, I
> don't really see how one could implement stable remote syncing
> without having transactions available to the engine.
> In my eyes syncing would come after transactions in the roadmap.
> 
> Of course what I would like most is you advancing transactions to the
> next build :-)

May be you are right.

We just prepare low level things to get transactions.
We are planning soon implement
    Change-log, 
    Rollback-log, 
    TimeStamps field in tables
    GUIID field type
    timstamp for runtime objects of engine.

Having this tools on hands we will go to transaction task.

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]