Null and concat (Solved)
Ivan Smahin
ivan_smahin at paradigmasoft.com
Sat Oct 6 01:54:37 CDT 2007
Hello Bart,
Friday, October 5, 2007, 9:19:05 PM, you wrote:
> Now it accepts both procedures and the method field shows <null>.
> OK now this brings the question why did it accept (before it was
> nullable) the first procedure. Why did it not complain about a null
> value not being acceptable for the method field?
> I believe the error reporting on this case is not what it should be.
> The only error that came was when the second procedure created a
> second record then Valentina complained about duplicate key in method
> unique.
> The only answer I see is that the result of the concat (which ought
> to be <null>) was not acceptable to the method and converted somehow
> to "something" else. Again I think it should have errored out on
> "null value not acceptable for field x"
Yes it should be exception. We will check and fix it.
> Bart Pietercil
> PS: don't forget on the little error in the WIKI page on concat
> missing ' in the second example
Fixed. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Ivan Smahin
Senior Software Engineer
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - The Ultra-Fast Database
http://www.valentina-db.com
More information about the Valentina
mailing list