BitSets and ArraySets important note!

[Joakim Schramm]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> valentina-bounces+joakim=astrocalc.com at lists.macserve.net 
> [mailto:valentina-bounces+joakim=astrocalc.com at lists.macserve.
net] On Behalf Of Ruslan Zasukhin
> Sent: 10 May 2006 10:56
> To: valentina at lists.macserve.net
> Subject: BitSets and ArraySets important note!
> 
> Hi Joakim,
> 
> VERY IMPORTANT note which is mentioned in docs
> 

Can you tell me were this is said? The docs is huge mass of text so I may
have missed it but I have read these parts many times, maybe too many times
to see anything!

> * when some function FindXXXXX( ..., set )
>   expect set it is expect BitSet usually.
> 
>     you CANNOT send here ArraySet because then result is simple ZERO.
> 
>     THIS IS known issue which should be improved on kernel level..
>     
Well this stress further WHY I need FindLinkedAsBitSet in same style as
FindLinked. I can't search further in the linked set if I not get a bitset.
As for FindValueArraySet not being a bug it must in such case be it
"demands" a bitset in the InSet as Vset, but I haven't been able to test as
I can't get one from my linked records, only all linked records in tables
and then I can just not set in inSet argument as all, getting same result.

> 
> * [TIP] use in names of variables BitSet and ArraySet
> 
>     bitsSearchRes
> 
>     arrsSearchRes
> 
Yes this may be a good point, guess I am just a bit lazy, especially when
it's small functions with local vars. In VB it's also easy to just right
click the var to see its type.

Joakim
> --
> Best regards,
> 
> Ruslan Zasukhin
> VP Engineering and New Technology
> Paradigma Software, Inc
> 
> Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information http://www.paradigmasoft.com
> 
> [I feel the need: the need for speed]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>