Table structure?
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Mon May 1 21:48:43 CDT 2006
On 5/1/06 9:17 PM, "Joakim Schramm" <joakim at astrocalc.com> wrote:
>> Yes - 207,391 pairs will go into BinaryLink.
>>
>> I can say minimal size current will be 24, avg 36 bytes per pair.
>>
>> So in your case expected size of Binary Link should be 7.46 Mb.
>
> But this is a bit strange as it's much more then if I simply keep my Primary
> key. Well I will look at it again.
No, for NORMAL case of third M:M table - NO.
And than more know IF you will use STRINGS to be keys and PTRs.
Again, in your old db you SOMEHOW did play *without* third table.
So that was not real M:M relationship.
Again, when we will add optimization - specify DIRECTION of link usage,
then blink will be 2 times less, e.g. 3.2MB.
in best case it will be possible compact it to 2.4Mb.
----------
Do you want calculate size in old case?
If yes, please remind me WHAT Key filed was in ONE-left table
And what PTR fields was in MANY table with 207,391 records
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina
mailing list