Collection Object

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 8/3/06 8:19 PM, "Philip Mötteli" <philip.moetteli at econophone.ch> wrote:

>> * here we can have variants.
>> 
>>     One of them, that you develop this mechanism self as external
>> algorithms.
> 
> That would destroy the very aim of this. As I said just some lines
> above, this application is only needed for performance optimization.
> I will automatically implement a LOCAL algorithm of this. Actually
> Apple has already done that for me:
> - (NSArray *)filteredArrayUsingPredicate:(NSPredicate *)predicate
> 
> 
>> Best of all in C++.
> 
> I do not have enough knowledge of C++ to deliver you such a code.
> And, I'm sorry, I really would prefer not have to learn C++ more than
> the minimum I know so far. I don't want to start yet another language
> war, so I don't go into more detail. It's not worth it.
> 
> 
>> I do not see so far where this can be
>> penalty from tech/performance view of point
> 
> If I have it locally, every record must be loaded and de-serialized,

I did mean - you make it, we plug it.
But not a problem.

> passed through KVC, only to throw most of these objects right away in
> the trash, because they don't fulfill the query. Having 30'000'000
> records and you are just looking for oneŠ this is a huge waste of
> resources.

Of course

>> What you think ?
> 
> Sorry! :-|

Okay.

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]