V4RB - DEFRAGMENT after deletion of records
RB User
fitzbew at nc.rr.com
Sun Sep 25 10:18:56 CDT 2005
On 9/25/05 3:45 AM, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public.kherson.ua> wrote:
>> I tried closing the DB between the delete operation and the defragment, but
>> it didn't help. After performing the defrag, the DB wouldn't open (threw
>> the usual -39 error).
>>
>> Diagnose says everything is ok, unless I perform the delete and the defrag
>> on the same DB. If I perform both operations on the same DB, the DB becomes
>> unusable after the defrag, and I can't run Diagnose.
>
>>> So you use 1.10 ?
>>> Even not 1.11 ?
>>
>> I have upgraded to 1.11 today, but the problem persists.
>>
>> After experimenting today, I've discovered that the problem does not occur
>> if I only delete a few records from the table INSTEAD of all the records in
>> the table. I can delete a few records, then defrag, and the DB stays
>> usable.
>>
>> But if I delete ALL the records in the table, and then defrag, the DB
>> becomes unusable.
>
> Very strange. It seems many people have use Defragment long time, nobody
> complains on this.
>
Yes! Works wonderfully, unless I delete all the records in the table!
Let me check and see if the problem goes away with 2.X. Perhaps this is
just Fate telling me I should've already migrated this project to 2.x. :-)
>
>> Unrelated side note: Is the V4RB 2.0.5 download for Mac OS X not working? I
>> think the installer is missing something. I get an error when I try to run
>> it. I wanted to see if this current problem goes away with 2.0.5. (Ruslan, I
>> also promised you earlier this month I would check and see if the aggregate
>> function permissions issue went away with 2.0.5, but I haven't had time
>> yet!)
>
> 2.0.5 do works, several RB developers have confirm this on beta list.
>
Forgive me, I was committing a blunder during the install.
> What OS you use ?
OS X.3.9.
Russ
More information about the Valentina
mailing list