VCursor.AddRecord

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 11/28/05 8:13 PM, "Ed Kleban" <Ed at Kleban.com> wrote:

> Since:
> 
>     VCursor.DropRecord
> removes a record from the cursor, but not from the tables the info was
> extracted from, whereas:
> 
>     VCursor.DeleteRecord
> removes a record both from the cursor and the original table, and
> 
>     VCursor.UpdateRecord
> writes values through the cursor back into the original table,
> 
> ...then I'm presuming that...
> 
>     Vcursor.AddRecord()
> will add a new record to BOTH the cursor as well as to the original table,
> correct?

Yes. 

Cursor must be ReadOnly = false
 
In fact, such cursor do not have own records. It work over original

> And what is done for fields in the original table that are not included in
> the cursor?  Presumably they are set to their blank value equivalents?

BLANK

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]