VChar vs VText
Frank Schima
macsforever2000 at goodeast.com
Fri Nov 25 15:21:15 CST 2005
Hi Jon,
On Nov 25, 2005, at 3:04 PM, jda wrote:
> Is there any advantage to VarChar (remember, typical data of 5-200
> chars per fields, UTF-16 encoding)? And what segment size is
> optimal (for saving storage space)?
You do not set the segment size with a VarChar, instead it is the
maximum size. 1022 is the minimum value you should use, at least for
double byte encodings like UTF-16 which is the default. I'm not sure
what the header size is, so if you need to jump to the next optimal
size, I don't think 2044 is the proper value, probably it should be
less. Perhaps Ruslan can comment on this?
My understanding is that VarChar is faster and more space efficient
than VText. Really, Vtext is only for holding potentially large
amounts of text.
Best regards,
Frank Schima
I'm currently job hunting:
<http://homepage.mac.com/macsforever2000/resume.html>
More information about the Valentina
mailing list