VSDK 2.x
Matthew Jew
mjew at icnc.com
Tue May 17 13:56:26 CDT 2005
Ruslan,
Thank you for the quick response.
I have been using XCode with VSDK 1.x very successfully for some time
now.
Do you know when you will begin the beta test of VSDK 2.x?
And also do an XCode version?
- Matthew
On May 17, 2005, at 7:22 AM, valentina-request at lists.macserve.net wrote:
>
> On 5/17/05 5:10 AM, "Matthew Jew" <mjew at icnc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mathew,
>
>> Will there be a C++ VSDK 2.x?
>
> Yes of course.
>
>> If so, is there any projected date for release?
>> Or beta testing program?
>
> Actually I is very easy for us start beta testing of C++ SDK.
>
> * the same Vcomponent folders which you V4RB and V4MD
> * plus folder of Headers and sources.
>
> Note, we have now CodeWarrior and Visual versions.
> No xCode yet.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> FYI about C++ SDK 2.0
>
> We introduce 3 levels of access to C++ sources:
>
> 1) basic: $299.
>
> you get so called PUBLIC folder of our sources.
> this contains all required Interfaces and Util
> which have THE SAME functionality as V4RB and V4MD.
> Not more not less.
>
> 2) pro (it seems $700, not remember)
>
> you get the same PUBLIC folder plus ALL HEADER of PROTECTED folder
> this gives you about 300 more files.
>
> you get e.g. Headers of cache, importers, and so on...
> This allow you define own subclasses of our interfaces and so on.
>
> 3) architect
>
> you get full sources of PUBLIC and PROTECTED folders.
> this is 90-95% of sources of Valentina.
>
> Only behind is PRIVATE folder which contains indexes
> algorithms.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Ruslan Zasukhin
> VP Engineering and New Technology
> Paradigma Software, Inc
>
> Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
> http://www.paradigmasoft.com
>
> [I feel the need: the need for speed]
>
More information about the Valentina
mailing list